I.
IMPARTLALITY. WHERE STATE AND FEDERAL JUDGE'S
ANO JUSTICES IMPARTIALTYCAN REASONABLY BE AND 28U.S.C.
4SS(A). SIINCE APRIL I9I5 THE LINITED STATES OISTRICT
COURT FOR THE EASTERN CISTRICTOF NORTH CAROUNAOIVISION OF RALEIGH NORTH CARALINA - OBSTRUCTEN
PLAINTIFF'S ACCESS TOTHE COLIRT FOR PLIRPOSES OE
CONCEALING FORGED GOVERNMENTAL DOCUMENTS
- WILTH THE MAELSTRATE ANO DISTRICT COURT JUDGE'S
FALSIFYING EVIDENCE RENOERING FORGED RULINGS
ANO JUOGMENTS.
HIDING BEHINO THE LAWTO ELLIDE THE TRLIE FACTS ANO
THE ENIDENCE OE PLALNTIEF'S ACTUALINNOCENCE- ARLISLNG
THEIR OLSCRETION. IMPARTIALITY IN APPLYING LAW AND FACTS
NOT INEVIDENCE OR CAURT RECORDS; FORGED JUDGMENTSPOLITICAL BIAS- PERSONALINJURIES- THE FOURTH CIRCUIT CONCEOUNG TO THE ILLEGAL INNASIONOF PLAINTMES
RIGHTS. ABUSING THE PRACESS BY OIRECTLYTAINTING HIS
1995 ANO 199T HABEAS PROCEEDINGS - ACTS THAT DOES NOT
APPLY WJHENA FEDERAL STATLITE - REGLLATONOR POLICY
LOYEE TO FOLLOW.

II
CIHETHER THE FEOERAL AND STATE COURTS PROCLAIM
THE UNIVERSAL DECLARATAN OF HUMANRIGHTS AS A
COMMON STANOARO OF ACHIEMEMENT FOR ALL PEOPLE
ANOALLNATIONS- WITH REGAROSTOARTICLE-H OF
THE OECLARATON-SLAVERY... AND ARTICLE- IOF THE
BILLOF RIGHTS- ALL ARE EQLIAL BEFORE THE LAW ANO
ARE ENTITLEDWITHOLT ANY OIS CRIMINATION TO THE EQUAL PROTECTIAN OF THE LAW. OOES NAT THE RILLOT RIGHTS
L.SHETHER THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES
AND THE NORTH CARALNA GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES CALLUOED WITH A PRIVATE CITIZEN'S PERSANAL VENOETTA.
SLEST- ORSTRUCTED PLAINTIFFS COURT ACCESS- COMMITTING INTENTIONIALACTS TO FALSELYIMPRISON HIM CAUILD BE INTERPRETED AS ENSLAVING PLAINTIFF SPAULOING
WHERE THE OEFENDANTS KNEUS BEFOREHAND THE CRIMES
WERE FALSE... FAILING TO RIGHT A MISCARRIAGEINTHE
ROBBING PLAINTIFF OF HIS LIBERTY THROUGH FALSE ARREST
- FALSE IMPRISONMENT AND MALICIOUIS PROSECLITION
THE ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS OF GROSS NEGLIGENCE-A
DUTY OF CARE - BREACHING THAT OUTY TO ENSLAVE PLAINTIFF SPAULONE.

III.
HERE THE LINITEO STATES OISTRICT COURT FOR THE
OLSTRICTOF COLUIMBIA CALISED PREJUIAICIAL ERRORIN
TRANSFERING PLAINTIFF'S TORT CLAIMS BACK TO THE.
RALEIGH NORTH CAROLINA DISTRIST COURT - THE

Whether the district court erred in dismissing petitioner's claims alleging violations of their civil rights, due process, and free speech rights