Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in denying a request for a certificate of appealability because reasonable jurists would find it debatable whether Ingebretsen could show cause and prejudice under Martinez v. Ryan to overcome the procedural default on the claim that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate the facts or review the State's evidence prior to advising Ingebretsen to plead guilty?

Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in denying a request for a certificate of appealability