No. 18-5774
Rochelle Driessen v. Royal Bank of Scotland
IFP
Tags: appellate-review circuit-conflict civil-procedure civil-rights due-process judicial-review procedural-standard standing summary-order supreme-court supreme-court-precedent united-states-court-of-appeals
Latest Conference:
2018-10-26
Question Presented (from Petition)
WHETHER THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT'S MAY 259 2017, SUMMARY ORDER IS IN DIRECT CONFLICT WITH A DECISION OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT IN NEITZKE v. WILLIAMS, 490 U.S. 319 (1989)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit's May 25, 2017, summary order is in direct conflict with a decision of the United States Supreme Court in Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319 (1989)
Docket Entries
2018-10-29
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2018-10-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/26/2018.
2017-12-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 26, 2018)
Attorneys
Rochelle Driessen
Rochelle Driessen — Petitioner