No. 18-5738
Bill Paul Marquardt v. Julie L. Jones, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.
IFP
Tags: appellate-jurisdiction capital-collateral-regional-counsel collateral-order-doctrine constitutional-rights due-process habeas-corpus jurisdiction jurisdictional-challenge pro-se-claims self-representation
Latest Conference:
2018-10-26
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the three collateral-order-doctrine conditions are satisfied and the U.S. Court of Appeals can take jurisdiction on in pro se claims, where the U.S. District Court had taken away my self-representation stated conclusive terms on my self-representation, stricken my Prose Motion, and directed the Capital (Regional) Counsel to Amend my Prose Petition for a Capital Case Writ of Habeas Corpus.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
whether-the-three-collateral-order-doctrine-conditions-are-satisfied-and-the-u.s.-court-of-appeals-can-take-jurisdiction-on-my-pro-se-claims,-where-the-u.s.-district-court-had-taken-away-my-self-representation
Docket Entries
2018-10-29
Petition DENIED.
2018-10-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/26/2018.
2018-10-08
Notice of state court appointed counsel Julissa R. Fontan, Esq. received. (Distributed)
2018-09-24
Brief of respondents Julie Jones, et al. in opposition filed.
2018-06-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 24, 2018)
Attorneys
Bill P. Marquardt
Bill Paul Marquardt — Petitioner
Julie Jones, et al.
Carolyn M. Snurkowski — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent