No. 18-5711

Edwin C. Coleman v. Carrie M. Ward

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2018-08-22
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights due-process equal-protection government-guidelines government-regulations property-rights standing
Latest Conference: 2018-10-26
Question Presented (from Petition)

Right to kquat peotectin And due process oF /AW.
deFedAnt boT mAte A Request FonAheing uder locAd Rule 105.6
8F the Maytod Code shauld not A heang beheld on At teast
The pequests be Addessed As pAat of the 4t Amedument peoteto
A depAtn of ppey wit d s oF AW.
3.0id Respondents have standi to Foecloseon A opety
Whose supposed owweroF The Note wAs FANnie MAe. whew no
the Court Reconds that teansters sach powen As substitute
trustee to the Mespondents,
4. Does FAilune to compywith Govemest Gudelives iN A contctun
AgeeMent FoR FundsoR Movies IssuediN leudf Thase quideliNes
NeAch A height of vo/AtioN oF Due Ppecess of lAW ANd FquAl
Protecton uder the Aw wher the goverments terest ao the
Process ts Not met, by Not Following the qudelies.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the government's failure to comply with its own guidelines for the provision of funds violates due process and equal protection under the law

Docket Entries

2018-10-29
Petition DENIED.
2018-10-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/26/2018.
2018-08-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 21, 2018)

Attorneys

Edwin C. Coleman
Edwin C. Coleman — Petitioner