Edwin C. Coleman v. Carrie M. Ward
Right to kquat peotectin And due process oF /AW.
deFedAnt boT mAte A Request FonAheing uder locAd Rule 105.6
8F the Maytod Code shauld not A heang beheld on At teast
The pequests be Addessed As pAat of the 4t Amedument peoteto
A depAtn of ppey wit d s oF AW.
3.0id Respondents have standi to Foecloseon A opety
Whose supposed owweroF The Note wAs FANnie MAe. whew no
the Court Reconds that teansters sach powen As substitute
trustee to the Mespondents,
4. Does FAilune to compywith Govemest Gudelives iN A contctun
AgeeMent FoR FundsoR Movies IssuediN leudf Thase quideliNes
NeAch A height of vo/AtioN oF Due Ppecess of lAW ANd FquAl
Protecton uder the Aw wher the goverments terest ao the
Process ts Not met, by Not Following the qudelies.
Whether the government's failure to comply with its own guidelines for the provision of funds violates due process and equal protection under the law