I. "The Sixth Circuit is alone in its PLRA interpretation that a sua sponte dismissal for failure to state a claim at screening no longer affords a "full and fair opportunity" to object or amend the complaint but that res judicata applies.

II. Did the Former Facts combined with the new Facts state viable claims for retaliation, conspiracy, deliberate indifference, RICO, Rehabilitation Act and ADA?

Whether the Sixth Circuit's interpretation of the PLRA's dismissal procedures denies a fair and adequate opportunity to object or amend the complaint