HAS THE THIRD CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ENTERED A DECISION
THAT IS IN CONFLICT WITH THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT,
ALL OTHER COURTS OF APPEALS, FEDEERAL LAWS, DECISIONS OF
THE STATES' COURT OF LAST RESORT AND THE UNITED STATES
CONSTITUTION RELATING TO THE ADEQUACY QUESTION OF A GIVEN
STATE RULE/STATUTE THAT COULD LAWFULLY BAR FEDERAL
HABEAS CORPUS REVIEW?

HAS THE THIRD CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ENTERED A DECISION
THAT IS IN CONFLICT WITH THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT,
ALL OTHER COURTS OF APPEALS, FEDERAL LAWS, DECISIONS OF THE
STATES' COURT OF LAST RESORT AND THE UNITED STATES
CONSTITUTION RELATING TO AN ALLEGED PROCEDURAL DEFAULT
THAT COULD LAWFULLY BAR FEDERAL HABEAS CORPUS REVIEW?

HAS THE THIRD CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ENTERED A DEISION
THAT IS IN CONFLICT WITH THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT,
ALL OTHER COURTS OF APPEALS AND FEDERAL LAWS RELATING TO
THE APPLICABILITY OF A FED.R.CIV.P. 60(b)(6) MOTION IN THE CASE
SUB JUDICE?

Has the Third Circuit Court of Appeals entered a decision that is in conflict with the United States Supreme Court, all other Courts of Appeals, federal laws, decisions of the States' Court of Last Resort and the United States Constitution relating to the adequacy question of a given state rule/statute that could lawfully bar federal habeas corpus review?