DID THE STAFF OF THE "PROJECT FREEDOM FUND" WHO PROVIDED
FAULTY LEGAL ADVICE TO PETITIONER, AND THUS INDUCED HER TO
WITHDRAW A GUILTY PLEA FOR WHICH SHE WOULD HAVE BEEN
SENTENCED TO ONLY FIFTEEN (15) YEARS, RENDER LEGAL
REPRESENTATION DESPITE NOT HAVING BEEN ADMITTED TO PRACTICE
LAW IN NEW JERSEY, THUS VIOLATE PETITIONER'S RIGHT TO
EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL? (U.S. Const. Amendment Six)

DID THE ABOVE CRCUMSTANCES CONSTITUTE INEFFECTIVE
ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL (U.S. Const. Amend. Six)

Did the staff of the 'Project Freedom Fund' who provided faulty legal advice to petitioner, and thus induced her to withdraw a guilty plea for which she would have been sentenced to only fifteen (15) years, render legal representation despite not having been admitted to practice law in New Jersey, thus violate petitioner's right to effective assistance of counsel?