No. 18-5618
Tae H. Chon v. Barack H. Obama, former President of the United States, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review criminal-procedure fairness integrity judicial-proceedings plain-error preservation-of-error remand substantial-rights tenth-circuit
Latest Conference:
2018-10-26
Question Presented (from Petition)
Where the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit leaves open the question of whether or not a plain error affects the petitioner's substantial rights and implicates the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings, is remand proper where the plain error was not preserved?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a plain error affects the petitioner's substantial rights and implicates the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings, and whether remand is proper where the plain error was not preserved
Docket Entries
2018-10-29
Petition DENIED.
2018-10-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/26/2018.
2018-09-17
Waiver of right of respondents Barack H. Obama, former President of the United States, et al. to respond filed.
2018-03-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 17, 2018)
Attorneys
Barack H. Obama, former President of the United States, et al.
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Tae H. Chon
Tae H. Chon — Petitioner