No. 18-396
Brittan Holland, et al. v. Kelly Rosen, et al.
Tags: bail bail-reform-act criminal-procedure due-process eighth-amendment fourth-amendment monetary-bail new-jersey pretrial-detention pretrial-liberty restrictive-conditions
Key Terms:
DueProcess FourthAmendment Punishment Privacy
DueProcess FourthAmendment Punishment Privacy
Latest Conference:
2018-10-26
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether New Jersey, which authorizes monetary bail, but affirmatively requires courts to exhaust more restrictive non-monetary conditions before even considering monetary bail, unnecessarily restricts pretrial liberty in violation of the Eighth Amendment, Due Process Clause, or Fourth Amendment.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether New Jersey's law prohibiting courts from considering monetary bail unless no combination of non-monetary conditions will reasonably assure the accused's appearance unnecessarily restricts pretrial liberty in violation of the Eighth Amendment, Due Process Clause, or Fourth Amendment
Docket Entries
2018-10-29
Petition DENIED.
2018-10-17
Brief amici curiae of Criminal Defense Attorneys filed. (Distributed)
2018-10-17
Brief amici curiae of Bail Agents Associations filed. (Distributed)
2018-10-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/26/2018.
2018-10-10
Blanket Consent filed by Petitioners, Brittan Holland, et al..
2018-10-10
Letter of October 10, 2018 from counsel for petitioners received. (Distributed)
2018-10-04
Waiver of right of respondents Kelly Rosen, et al. to respond filed.
2018-09-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 29, 2018)
Attorneys
Bail Agents Associations
Brittan Holland, et al.
Paul D. Clement — Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Petitioner
Criminal Defense Attorneys
Michael Hugh McGinley — Dechert LLP, Amicus
Kelly Rosen, et al.