No. 18-194
Craig Robert Nunn v. Tennessee Department of Correction, et al.
Tags: community-supervision-for-life constitutional-law criminal-law criminal-sentencing due-process ex-post-facto parole-conditions retroactive-application retroactive-punishment sex-offender-directives sex-offender-registration
Key Terms:
Takings Privacy
Takings Privacy
Latest Conference:
2018-10-26
Question Presented (from Petition)
Does the retroactive application of the Sex Offender Directives to Mr. Nunn violate the Ex Post Facto Clause of the United States Constitution?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the retroactive application of the Sex Offender Directives to Mr. Nunn violate the Ex Post Facto Clause of the United States Constitution?
Docket Entries
2018-10-29
Petition DENIED.
2018-10-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/26/2018.
2018-09-13
Brief of respondents Tennessee Department Of Correction, et al. in opposition filed.
2018-08-12
Application (17A1345) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until August 12, 2018.
2018-08-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 13, 2018)
2018-06-01
Application (17A1345) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from June 13, 2018 to August 12, 2018, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
Craig R. Nunn
Joseph Alexander Little IV — Bone McAllester Norton PLLC, Petitioner
Tennessee DOC, et al.
Jonathan David Shaub — Office of the Tennessee Attorney General, Respondent