No. 18-1419
Andrea Hirst, et al. v. SkyWest, Inc., et al.
Tags: ashcroft-v-iqbal context-specific fair-labor-standards-act iqbal-standard pleading-requirements rule-8 wage-violations workweek workweek-averaging
Key Terms:
Arbitration ERISA WageAndHour JusticiabilityDoctri
Arbitration ERISA WageAndHour JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-06-20
Related Cases:
18-1097
(Vide)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Must an employee protected by the Fair Labor Standards Act always allege wage violations averaged across a specific seven-day workweek, or may an employee plead a cause of action with alternative context-specific allegations to meet the plausibility requirements of Rule 8 and Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009)?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Must an employee protected by the Fair Labor Standards Act always allege wage violations averaged across a specific seven-day workweek, or may an employee plead a cause of action with alternative context-specific allegations to meet the plausibility requirements of Rule 8 and Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009)?
Docket Entries
2019-06-24
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/20/2019.
2019-06-03
Reply of petitioners Andrea Hirst, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2019-05-21
Brief of respondents Skywest, Inc., et al. in opposition filed.
2019-05-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 12, 2019)
2019-04-04
Application (18A1007) granted by Justice Kavanaugh extending the time to file until May 11, 2019.
2019-04-01
Application (18A1007) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 11, 2019 to May 11, 2019, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.
Attorneys
Andrea Hirst, et al.
Gregory F. Coleman — Greg Coleman Law P.C., Petitioner
Skywest, Inc., et al.
Shay Dvoretzky — Jones Day, Respondent