No. 18-1097
SkyWest, Inc., et al. v. Andrea Hirst, et al.
Amici (2)
Experienced Counsel
Tags: airlines discrimination dormant-commerce-clause federal-preemption federal-statute interstate-commerce judicial-review preemption state-law statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2019-06-20
Related Cases:
18-1419
(Vide)
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Is a state law exempt from the Dormant
Commerce Clause merely because it does not discriminate against interstate commerce?
2. Is a state law exempt from the Dormant
Commerce Clause merely because Congress has
passed a federal statute saving the law from preemption under that statute?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is a state law exempt from the Dormant Commerce Clause merely because it does not discriminate against interstate commerce or because Congress has passed a federal statute saving the law from preemption?
Docket Entries
2019-06-24
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/20/2019.
2019-05-13
Reply of petitioners SkyWest, Inc., et al. filed.
2019-04-24
Brief of respondents Andrea Hirst, et al. in opposition filed.
2019-03-25
Brief amicus curiae of Airlines for America filed.
2019-03-25
Brief amicus curiae of American Trucking Associations, Inc. filed.
2019-03-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 24, 2019.
2019-03-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 25, 2019 to April 24, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-02-27
Letter amending the Corporate Disclosure Statement received by petitioners.
2019-02-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 25, 2019)
Attorneys
Airlines For America
Robert A. Siegel — O'Melveny & Myers, Amicus
American Trucking Associations, Inc.
Richard Pianka — ATA Litigation Center, Amicus
Andrea Hirst, et al.
Gregory F. Coleman — Greg Coleman Law PC, Respondent
SkyWest, Inc., et al.
Shay Dvoretzky — Jones Day, Petitioner