1. Is it proper for a court to certify a class by suggesting that individual issues can be resolved by the submission of affidavits from each individual class member?

2. Does the lower court's suggestion Defendant can challenge the class members' credibility by obtaining the testimony of a representative sample of the class members, and present evidence contradicting statements found in particular affidavits comport with due process?

Proper certification of nationwide class for implied warranty and consumer fraud claims despite individual issues