No. 25A737
Frank Polo v. Scott Bernstein, et al.
Tags: access-to-courts constitutional-rights due-process judicial-recusal procedural-fairness shotgun-pleading
Latest Conference:
N/A
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Eleventh Circuit violated a pro se litigant's constitutional right of access to courts and due process by applying an inconsistent and overly broad shotgun-pleading doctrine that arbitrarily dismissed claims without addressing core constitutional issues
Docket Entries
2025-12-29
Application (25A737) denied by Justice Thomas.
2025-12-08
Application (25A737) for a stay, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Attorneys
Frank Polo
Frank Polo — Petitioner