No. 25A571

Joseph Daryll Rued, et al. v. Jaykumar Jayswal, et al.

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: N/A
Status: Denied
Type: A
Tags: child-protection constitutional-rights custody-proceedings due-process fraud perjury
Latest Conference: 2026-01-09
Question Presented (from Petition)

Should an emergency injunction issue to inhibit Defendants below and Respondents here from sustaining reliance upon the admitted fraud and perjury of Hennepin County Child Protection Services CPS investigator Respondent Jaykumar Jayswal's CHIPSP, which has been admitted to be falsified under oath, and the fraud in conspiracy of other Respondents relying upon the same, to deprive Constitutionally protected rights of Applicants pending final adjudication of Applicants'/Petitioners' Petition for Writ of Certiorari and/or Petition for Writ of Prohibition and, alternatively, Rule Nisi in this Court?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a state child protection agency's alleged fraudulent or perjured petition violates a parent's constitutional due process rights when used to initiate child custody proceedings

Docket Entries

2026-01-12
Application (25A571) denied by the Court.
2025-12-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/9/2026.
2025-12-03
Application (25A571) referred to the Court.
2025-11-19
Application (25A571) refiled and submitted to Justice Alito.
2025-11-17
Application (25A571) denied by Justice Kavanaugh.
2025-11-07
Application (25A571) for an injunction, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.

Attorneys

Joseph Rued, et al.
Joseph Rued — Petitioner