No. 25A381
Upsolve, Inc., et al. v. Letitia James, Attorney General of New York
Tags: constitutional-review content-based-restriction first-amendment intermediate-scrutiny purpose-based-distinction speech-regulation
Latest Conference:
N/A
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether content-based speech restrictions that purport to draw distinctions based on the purpose of regulated speech are subject to strict or intermediate First Amendment scrutiny
Docket Entries
2025-12-17
Application (25A381) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until February 6, 2026.
2025-12-10
Application of Upsolve, Inc., et al. for a further extension of time submitted.
2025-12-10
Application (25A381) to extend further the time from January 7, 2026 to February 6, 2026, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
2025-10-05
Application (25A381) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until January 7, 2026.
2025-09-29
Application (25A381) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 8, 2025 to January 7, 2026, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
Attorneys
Letitia James, in her official capacity as Attorney General of New York
Barbara Dale Underwood — New York Solicitor General, Respondent
Upsolve, Inc., et al.
Robert James McNamara — Institute for Justice, Petitioner