1. Whether Dorchester County's occupation of =66% of Lot 10 without condemnation or compensation is a per se taking under Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp., 458 U.S. 419 (1982).

2. Whether depriving Plaintiffs of beneficial use while taxing 100% of Lot 10 is a categorical taking under Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council, 505 U.S. 1003 (1992).

3. Whether Dorchester County of South Carolina's concealment of federal permits, ghostwritten affidavits, spoliated video evidence, fabricated maps, and obstruction constitutes egregious fraud upon the court under Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co., 322 U.S. 238 (1944).

4. Whether the refusal of the Fourth Circuit and USDC-Charleston to correct these wrongs amounts to judicial tolerance of fraud, contrary to Stop the Beach Renourishment v. Fla. DEP, 560 U.S. 702 (2010).

Question not identified.