No. 25A189

Mawule Tepe v. Whirlpool Corporation, et al.

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2025-08-15
Status: Denied
Type: A
Tags: due-process federal-jurisdiction legal-practice removal-jurisdiction sixth-amendment state-court-removal
Latest Conference: N/A
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Whether Applicant is not only entitled to a preliminary injunction enjoining the proceeding pending before the U.S. District Court for Eastern District of Tennessee (or EDTN) but also, whether he is entitled to a preliminary injunction enjoining Respondents from unconstitutionally removing any of his cases from Bradley County Civil Circuit Court of State of Tennessee to the U.S. District Court for Eastern District of Tennessee because they are not eligible to practice law at EDTN and because of EDTN's bias against Applicant.

2. Did the courts below err in not enjoining the unconstitutional proceedings and thereby subject Applicant to a here-and-now injury that cannot be remedied after the proceeding is over?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether federal district courts may improperly remove state court cases when attorneys are not admitted to practice in that federal district court and potentially violate due process rights

Docket Entries

2025-08-20
Application (25A189) denied by Justice Kavanaugh.
2025-08-11
Application (25A189) for injunctive relief, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.

Attorneys

Mawule Tepe
Mawule Tepe — Petitioner