No. 25A1122
Naquea Elaine Johnson v. New Jersey, et al.
Tags: due-process-clause in-forma-pauperis jurisdictional-fraud M.L.B.-v.-S.L.J. parental-rights void-judgment
Latest Conference:
N/A
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Due Process Clause requires individualized financial analysis under M.L.B. v. S.L.J. before denying in forma pauperis status in parental rights cases, and whether void judgments obtained through jurisdictional fraud and concealment of evidence may be challenged at any time notwithstanding procedural deadlines
Docket Entries
2026-04-13
Application (25A1122) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until June 12, 2026.
2026-04-08
Application (25A1122) for an extension of time within which to comply with the order of an extension of time within which to comply, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
Naquea E. Johnson
Naquea Johnson — Petitioner