No. 25-993
Vincenzo Oppedisano v. Lynda Zur
Tags: choice-of-law diversity-jurisdiction federal-courts partnership-formation state-law summary-judgment
Latest Conference:
2026-04-24
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether a federal court sitting in diversity may treat a single factor as dispositive in assessing partnership formation, contrary to this Court's precedent and controlling state law.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a federal court sitting in diversity may treat a single factor as dispositive in assessing partnership formation, contrary to this Court's precedent and controlling state law.
Docket Entries
2026-04-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/24/2026.
2026-03-23
Brief of Lynda Zur in opposition submitted.
2026-03-23
Brief of respondent Lynda Zur in opposition filed.
2026-02-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 23, 2026)
2025-10-24
Application (25A466) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until February 16, 2026.
2025-10-21
Application (25A466) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 18, 2025 to February 16, 2026, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
Attorneys
Lynda Zur
Daniel DeSouza — DeSouza Law, P.A., Respondent
Vincenzo Oppedisano
Michael Vincent Caruso — Cuddy & Feder LLP, Petitioner