No. 25-985
Evan Norman v. Deputy Lee Ingle, et al.
Tags: appellate-jurisdiction genuine-issue-of-fact interlocutory-appeal qualified-immunity summary-judgment video-evidence
Key Terms:
FirstAmendment Privacy
FirstAmendment Privacy
Latest Conference:
N/A
Question Presented (from Petition)
In an interlocutory qualified immunity appeal involving video evidence, under what circumstances, if any, may an appellate court review a district court's determination that there is a genuine dispute of fact?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
In an interlocutory qualified immunity appeal involving video evidence, under what circumstances, if any, may an appellate court review a district court's determination that there is a genuine dispute of fact?
Docket Entries
2026-02-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 23, 2026)
2026-01-05
Application (25A677) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until February 13, 2026.
2025-12-30
Application (25A677) to extend further the time from January 16, 2026 to February 13, 2026, submitted to Justice Alito.
2025-12-10
Application (25A677) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until January 16, 2026.
2025-12-05
Application (25A677) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 17, 2025 to January 16, 2026, submitted to Justice Alito.
Attorneys
Evan Norman
Daniel Hirotsu Woofter — Russell & Woofter LLC, Petitioner