When the Commission rejects factual findings of an administrative law judge and makes its own contrary findings, must courts defer to the "findings of the Commission" if supported by substantial evidence, as the Third, Sixth, and Eighth Circuits hold, or should courts instead defer to the contrary findings of the administrative law judge that the Commission rejected, as the Fourth, Ninth, Tenth, and D.C. Circuits hold?

Whether courts must defer to the factual findings of an administrative agency commission supported by substantial evidence, or instead defer to contrary findings of an administrative law judge that the commission rejected