1. Whether the First Circuit erred in holding that Petitioner's contractual and constitutional rights were discharged under PROMESA's Title III Plan of Adjustment despite certified, self-authenticating government records demonstrating the existence of an active and enforceable government contract, in conflict with Federal Rules of Evidence 902 and longstanding Fifth Amendment protections for vested property rights.

2. Whether the First Circuit violated the Fifth Amendment's Due Process Clause by issuing a mandate without adjudicating constitutional claims supported by self-authenticating electronic government communications transmitted under federally authorized emergency procedures, whose legal effect cannot be nullified by ultra vires actions of territorial officials or displaced by assertions of authority by the Financial Oversight and Management Board.

3. Whether ultra vires assertions by the Financial Oversight and Management Board — whose members were removed by the President on August 6-7, 2025 —may constitutionally extinguish private contractual and property rights during a federally declared emergency, in conflict with the Supremacy Clause, PROMESA, and this Court's precedents including Humphrey's Executor, Seila Law, Perry, and Federal Crop Insurance Corp. v. Merrill.

Whether the First Circuit erred in holding that petitioner's contractual and constitutional rights were discharged under PROMESA's Title III Plan of Adjustment despite certified government records demonstrating an active and enforceable government contract, in conflict with the Fifth Amendment and Federal Rules of Evidence 902