No. 25-964

TNSG Health Co., Ltd., et al. v. Murray Colin Clarke, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2026-02-17
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: circuit-split intellectual-property lanham-act trademark-infringement trademark-registration used-in-commerce
Latest Conference: 2026-03-27
Question Presented (from Petition)

Under the Lanham Act, any "trademark used in commerce" may be registered. 15 U.S.C. § 1051. That "used in commerce" standard is more lenient than the standard required for trademark infringement, which demands that the allegedly infringing mark have been "use[d] in commerce * * * in connection with the sale, offering for sale, distribution, or advertising of any goods or services." 15 U.S.C. § 1114 (emphasis added). The question presented is whether the Ninth Circuit erred in nevertheless holding, in direct conflict with the unanimous holdings of various other federal courts, that a plaintiff can satisfy the infringement standard by alleging mere registration.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in holding that a plaintiff can satisfy the Lanham Act trademark infringement standard under 15 U.S.C. § 1114 by alleging mere registration, contrary to the requirement that an infringing mark be used in commerce in connection with the sale, offering for sale, distribution, or advertising of goods or services

Docket Entries

2026-03-30
Petition DENIED.
2026-03-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/27/2026.
2026-03-03
Waiver of Murray Colin Clarke, et al. of right to respond submitted.
2026-03-03
Waiver of right of respondent Murray Colin Clarke, et al. to respond filed.
2026-02-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 19, 2026)

Attorneys

Murray Colin Clarke, et al.
Kian James HudsonBarnes & Thornburg LLP, Respondent
TNSG Health Co., Ltd., et al.
Brian Alfred SunNorton Rose Fulbright US LLP, Petitioner
Peter B. SiegalNorton Rose Fulbright US LLP, Petitioner