1. Whether a non-discriminatory rule imposing the usual burdens of voting is constitutional;

2. Whether a mail-voting rule is subject only to rational-basis review when the State makes in person voting available; and

3. Where Anderson-Burdick applies, whether a minimally burdensome voting rule is subject only to rational-basis review, and whether a rule's burden is measured by the cost of compliance or the consequence of noncompliance.

Whether a non-discriminatory mail-voting rule imposing usual voting burdens is constitutional under rational-basis review