No. 25-953
Finesse Wireless LLC v. AT&T Mobility LLC, et al.
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: credibility-determination expert-testimony federal-circuit judgment-as-matter-of-law jury-verdict patent-law
Key Terms:
Patent JusticiabilityDoctri
Patent JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
N/A
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether a purported inconsistency in the testimony of an expert witness is an issue of credibility for the jury to resolve, as every regional circuit holds, or whether it instead supplies a basis for judgment as a matter of law, as the Federal Circuit held below and routinely holds in other cases.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a purported inconsistency in the testimony of an expert witness is an issue of credibility for the jury to resolve or a basis for judgment as a matter of law
Docket Entries
2026-02-17
Waiver of Nokia of America Corporation of right to respond submitted.
2026-02-17
Waiver of right of respondents Nokia of America Corporation to respond filed.
2026-02-17
Waiver of right of respondent Nokia of America Corporation, et al. to respond filed.
2026-02-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 13, 2026)
Attorneys
AT&T Mobility LLC and Ericsson Inc.
Michael Hawes — Baker Botts, LLP, Respondent
Finesse Wireless LLC
Paul D. Clement — Clement & Murphy, PLLC, Petitioner
Nokia of America Corporation
Jeffrey Alan Lamken — MoloLamken LLP, Respondent