No. 25-948
Upsolve, Inc., et al. v. Letitia James, Attorney General of New York
Tags: content-neutrality first-amendment legal-advice nonprofit-speech speech-restriction unauthorized-practice-of-law
Latest Conference:
N/A
Question Presented (from Petition)
Is a law whose application is triggered by communicating about a particular topic nonetheless content-neutral so long as the law can be described as aimed at the "purpose, focus, and circumstance" of the speech rather than at its content?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is a law whose application is triggered by communicating about a particular topic nonetheless content-neutral so long as the law can be described as aimed at the 'purpose, focus, and circumstance' of the speech rather than at its content?
Docket Entries
2026-02-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 12, 2026)
2025-12-17
Application (25A381) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until February 6, 2026.
2025-12-10
Application (25A381) to extend further the time from January 7, 2026 to February 6, 2026, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
2025-10-05
Application (25A381) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until January 7, 2026.
2025-09-29
Application (25A381) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 8, 2025 to January 7, 2026, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
Attorneys
Upsolve, Inc., et al.
Robert James McNamara — Institute for Justice, Petitioner