Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether a voter who is moved into a new district and a legislator whose district is reconfigured by a court-drawn remedial map have standing to challenge that map or the underlying determination of VRA Section 2 liability that caused the remedial map to be drawn.
2. Whether a map drawn to remedy racial vote dilution is subject to strict scrutiny under the Equal Protection Clause when it is race conscious.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a voter who is moved into a new district and a legislator whose district is reconfigured by a court-drawn remedial map have standing to challenge that map or the underlying determination of VRA Section 2 liability that caused the remedial map to be drawn
2026-04-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted in part and the time is extended to and including June 2, 2026, for all respondents.
2026-04-09
Response of Jose Trevino, et al. to motion submitted.
2026-04-08
Motion of Steve Hobbs, Washington Secretary of State and State of Washington for an extension of time submitted.
2026-04-08
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 24, 2026 to June 23, 2026, submitted to The Clerk.
2026-03-25
Response Requested. (Due April 24, 2026)
2026-03-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/2/2026.
2026-03-06
Waiver of right of respondents Susan Soto Palmer, et al to respond filed.
2026-03-06
Waiver of right of respondent Steve Hobbs, Washington Secretary of State and State of Washington to respond filed.
2026-03-06
Waiver of right of respondents Susan Soto Palmer, et al. to respond filed.
2026-01-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 6, 2026)
2025-11-06
Application (25A522) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until January 24, 2026.
2025-10-24
Application (25A522) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 25, 2025 to January 24, 2026, submitted to Justice Kagan.