If a rule-making arm of a state court system, including but not limited to the JCC, approves a form for use (regardless if optional or not) to designate the record on appeal, should the Appellant be penalized and/or forfeit important right(s), should that form end up being deficient and/or otherwise contain one or more omission(s)?

If a rule-making arm of a state court system approves a form for use, should an appellant be penalized or forfeit rights if the form is deficient