1. Bivens and the Fourth Amendment— Whether a warrantless, post-warrant home entry—conducted hours after the original warrant was executed and without judicial authorization—falls within the recognized Bivens context,,as held by the First Circuit, or is categorically barred by Egbert v. Boule, as held by the Sixth Circuit, creating a direct conflict on a core Fourth Amendment issue.

2. Federal Funds and Qualified Immunity— Whether state and private actors whe receive federal funds through progeain like the Equitable Sharing Program and Bureau of astics Assistance eeants waive qualified immunity when their conduct violates the express civ rigs conditions attached to those funds. ,

3. RICO's Enterprise Element— Whether a private corporation and state officials may be held liable under RICO for a conspiracy to use fraudulent investigations to destroy a business, or whether the Sixth Circuit erred by requiring a "separate criminal purpose," a novel rule that conflicts with the Second and Seventh Circuits and this Court's precedent in Boyle ye ied Staten

4, Westfall Act and Constitutional Torts— Whether federal officers who conduct warrantless raids may invoke Westfall Act immunity to bar constitutional tort actions, despite 28 U.S.C, § abe: explicit preservation of such claims.

Whether a warrantless, post-warrant home entry conducted hours after the original warrant was executed and without judicial authorization falls within the recognized Bivens context or is categorically barred by Egbert v. Boule