1. Has the authority or ruling of the United States Supreme Court in Nashville,
Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. Waters, 294 U.S. 405 (1935), been
extinguished by the Respondent-Appellee, Exeter Finance LLC or by the Court
of Appeals for the 11th Circuit, permit the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh
Circuit to decide cases without due process of law and without any opportunity
to hear both parties in person?

2. Has the authority or decision of the United States Supreme Court in Carpenter
v. Longan, 83 U.S. 16 Wall. 271 (1872), been extinguished or overruled by the
U.S. District Court or by the Court of Appeals (11th Cir.) oi' by EXETER
FINANCE LLC, permit Exeter Finance LLC ' use of deprivation of rights and
property without due process of law decisions?

3. Does Exeter Finance LLC possess a federal due process right to repossess
automobiles without due process, and without Exeter 's signature on any
contract proving Exeter can really build security in- terest pursuant to the Due
Process Clause of the Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S.
Constitution, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3)?

4. Do the holdings in Bank v. Lanier, 78 U.S. 369 (1870), in First National Bank
of Tallapoosa v. Monroe, 135 GA 614; 69 S.E. 1123 (1911); and in C.E. Healey
&Son v. Stewardson National Bank, 1 N.E.2d 858 III. App. 290 (1936), render
Exeter Finance LLC corporate jurisdiction to lend its credit [ere- dit] to the
Petitioner of this case without due process of law?

5. Does the United States Supreme Court have the power to order the District
Court and the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in this case to compel
Respondent-Appellee, Exeter Finance LLC to provide discovery or initial
disclosures on how Exetei ' was able to lend its credit to this Petitioner-Appellant
and became surety, indorser, or guarantor for him?

6. Are all magistrate judges, District judges, and Circuit judges, creatures of the
law? And is it not true that they have an obligation to obey the law according
to United States v. Lee, 106 U.S. 196 at 220, (1882)?

7. Can a financial institution or a corporation or agency like Exeter Finance LLC
share personal information or disclose records pertaining individuals by any
means of communication-written, oral, electronic, or mechanical to third-
parties without the written consent of the individual pursuant to 5 U.S.C. §
552a (bXg), Bartel v. FAA, 725 F.2d 1403, 1409 (D.C. Cir. (1984)?

Whether the Supreme Court can compel the 11th Circuit and Exeter Finance LLC to provide due process and discovery in a mandamus petition involving automobile financing and personal rights