No. 25-75
Crocs, Inc. v. Double Diamond Distribution, Ltd., et al.
Amici (1)
Experienced Counsel
Tags: commercial-advertising intangible-properties lanham-act misrepresentation patent-status trademark-law
Key Terms:
Patent Trademark Copyright
Patent Trademark Copyright
Latest Conference:
2025-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Lanham Act's prohibition on "misrepresent[ations]" as to "nature, characteristics, [or] qualities" extends to misrepresentations about the product's intangible properties, like its patent status.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Lanham Act's prohibition on misrepresentations as to 'nature, characteristics, [or] qualities' extends to misrepresentations about the product's intangible properties, like its patent status
Docket Entries
2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-09-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-09-10
Reply of Crocs, Inc. submitted.
2025-09-10
Reply of petitioner Crocs, Inc. filed. (Distributed)
2025-08-21
Brief of Double Diamond Distribution, Ltd., et al. in opposition submitted.
2025-08-21
Amicus brief of Accessories Council submitted.
2025-08-21
Brief amicus curiae of Accessories Council filed.
2025-08-21
Brief of respondents Double Diamond Distribution, Ltd., et al. in opposition filed.
2025-07-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 21, 2025)
2025-04-22
Application (24A1020) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until July 18, 2025.
2025-04-18
Application (24A1020) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 19, 2025 to July 18, 2025, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
Accessories Council
Jeffrey S. Bucholtz — King & Spalding LLP, Amicus
Crocs, Inc.
Lisa S. Blatt — Williams & Connolly LLP, Petitioner
Double Diamond Distribution, Ltd., et al.