No. 25-746
Carvin L. Thomas, et al. v. Roberta Kustoff, Chairman, Tennessee Board of Parole, et al.
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: administrative-law constitutional-rights liberty-rights parole-interest procedural-due-process tennessee-law
Latest Conference:
2026-04-17
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Does a parole applicant in Tennessee have a liberty interest based on the expectation of parole?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does a parole applicant in Tennessee have a liberty interest based on the expectation of parole?
Docket Entries
2026-04-07
Reply of Carvin Thomas, et al. submitted.
2026-04-07
Reply of petitioners Carvin Thomas, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2026-03-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2026.
2026-03-09
Brief of Roberta Kustoff, et al. in opposition submitted.
2026-03-09
Brief of respondents Roberta Nevil Kustoff, et al. in opposition filed.
2026-02-02
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 11, 2026.
2026-01-30
Motion of Roberta Kustoff, et al. for an extension of time submitted.
2026-01-30
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 9, 2026 to March 11, 2026, submitted to The Clerk.
2026-01-09
Response Requested. (Due February 9, 2026)
2025-12-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/16/2026.
2025-12-29
Waiver of right of respondent Roberta Kustoff, et al. to respond filed.
2025-10-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 22, 2026)
Attorneys
Carvin Thomas, et al.
Paul Andrew Justice III — The Justice Law Office, Petitioner
Roberta Kustoff, et al.
Joshua Daniel Minchin — Office of Tennessee Attorney General, Respondent