No. 25-727
Douglas M. Folts v. United States
Response Waived
Tags: constitutional-rights first-amendment free-speech military-law obscenity-standard servicemembers
Key Terms:
FirstAmendment Privacy
FirstAmendment Privacy
Latest Conference:
2026-02-20
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the military's obscenity standard is unconstitutional under Parker v. Levy and Miller v. California.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the military's obscenity standard is unconstitutional under Parker v. Levy and Miller v. California
Docket Entries
2026-01-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/20/2026.
2026-01-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-12-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 20, 2026)
2025-10-15
Application (25A426) as to Mark A. Pulley granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until December 19, 2025.
2025-10-07
Application (25A426) as to Mark A. Pulley to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 20, 2025 to December 19, 2025, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
Douglas Folts, et al.
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent