No. 25-7185

Raymond Sipult v. Kerrie Lonard, Kansas Office of the Child Advocate

Lower Court: Kansas
Docketed: 2026-04-13
Status: Pending
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: due-process-clause fourteenth-amendment judicial-discretion minor-welfare-rights state-official-action writ-of-mandamus
Latest Conference: N/A
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Whether a state supreme court's denial of a writ of mandamus violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment when the petitioner demonstrates a clear legal right to the requested relief.

2. Whether the refusal of a state official to act, when challenged through a writ of mandamus, constitutes a federal question warranting review by the United States Supreme Court.

3. Whether a state court's denial of a motion for rehearing or modification exceeds the scope of judicial discretion when the petition involves matters affecting the rights and welfare of a minor under state supervision.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a state supreme court's denial of a writ of mandamus violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment when the petitioner demonstrates a clear legal right to the requested relief, and whether such denial constitutes a federal question warranting Supreme Court review when involving matters affecting the rights and welfare of a minor under state supervision

Docket Entries

2025-12-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 13, 2026)

Attorneys

Raymond Sipult
Raymond Sipult — Petitioner