No. 25-7182
David Johnson v. United States
IFP
Tags: demonstrative-aids expert-testimony federal-rules-of-evidence jury-deliberations rule-1006 rule-611
Latest Conference:
N/A
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether an expert's interpretive, pedagogical exhibit may be admitted into evidence under Rule 611(a) and reviewed by the jury during deliberations even when it does not comply with Federal Rule of Evidence 1006 and would otherwise be excluded as a demonstrative or illustrative aid that may not be provided to the jury.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether an expert's interpretive, pedagogical exhibit may be admitted into evidence under Federal Rule of Evidence 611(a) and reviewed by the jury during deliberations even when it does not comply with Federal Rule of Evidence 1006 and would otherwise be excluded as a demonstrative or illustrative aid
Docket Entries
2026-03-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 13, 2026)
Attorneys
David Johnson
Stephen James van Stempvoort — Miller Johnson, Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent