1. Right to Counsel : Whether the Florida Supreme Court and its agent,
The Florida Bar, deprived me, an indigent man, of my right to be
represented by counsel protected by the Due Process and Equal
Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment and the Sixth
Amendment to the U.S. Constitution before, during, and after
disciplinary proceedings against me—who had at all relevant times
proceeded as a common citizen —for alleged violations of Rules
Regulating The Florida Bar (RRTFB) which are indistinguishable
from criminal statutes punishing libel against the government
(judiciary) .

2. VLTRA-VIRES : Whether the Florida Supreme Court and its agent,
The Florida Bar, acted beyond their jurisdiction —VLTRA 'VIRES —
by harassing and prosecuting me, a layperson (Citizen Jose) who at
all relevant times proceeded only in his personal capacity, for libel
against the government (judiciary), and then extorting and suspending
attorney Jose Yeyille for ninety-one days for alleged violations of
RRTFB indistinguishable from criminal statutes punishing libel
against the government (judiciary), violated my rights to Free
Speech and Free Association, and to Petition the Government for
a Redress of Grievances protected by the First Amendment to the
U.S. Constitution .

3. Anti-SLAPP : Whether the Florida Supreme Court 's and its agent,
The Florida Bar's complaint and prosecution against me for criticizing
The judiciary of the state of Florida (public issues in court filings)
and denying to me the right to challenge the Report of Referee, and to
dismiss their inquisition under Florida Anti-SLAPP Statute §768.
295(4) violated my rights to Free Speech, Free Association, and to
Access the Courts, to Petition the Government (judiciary) for a
Redress of Grievances protected by the First Amendment, and
my rights to a Fair Trial, Due Process, and Equal Protection
protected by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution .

4. Absolute Litigation Privilege : Whether the Florida Supreme Court
and its agent, The Florida Bar, violated my right to absolute litigation
immunity and my rights to Free Speech and Due Process and Equal
Protection protected by the U.S. Constitution because, in my
capacity as common citizen , I criticized the judiciary of the state of
Florida and a law firm in court filings .

5. First Amendment : Whether the Florida Supreme Court and its agent
The Florida Bar's prosecution against me for Rules Regulating
The Florida Bar which are indistinguishable from criminal statutes
punishing libel against the government (judiciary) deprived me of
my rights to Free Speech, Free Association, and to Petition the
Government for a Redress of Grievances protected by the First
Amendment to the U.S. Constitution for criticizing the judiciary
of the state of Florida (public issues) exclusively in court filings .

5. Vagueness and Overbreath : Whether the Florida Supreme Court and
its agent The Florida Bar harassed, prosecuted, and extorted me for the
alleged violation of Rules Regulating The Florida Bar which are so
incurably vague and overbroad that they can be deceptively wielded as
criminal statutes to punish conduct in a way which they cannot

Whether the Florida Supreme Court and The Florida Bar violated petitioner's constitutional rights to counsel, free speech, due process, and equal protection by disciplining and suspending him for criticizing the judiciary in court filings without providing adequate procedural protections or recognizing litigation privilege and anti-SLAPP protections