Whether this Court should summarily reverse the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissal of the mandamus when it applies to a claim that Silas's guilty plea was involuntary and his Constitutional rights were violated on his 2255?

Both Rule 11 and the Constitutional requirement that pleas be knowingly and voluntary?

Whether the Eighth Circuit erred in dismissing a mandamus petition challenging the validity of a guilty plea on grounds that the plea was involuntary and violated constitutional rights, and whether Rule 11 and constitutional requirements for knowing and voluntary pleas were satisfied