1. Did the complaint in this case, factual allegations,
if taken as true, state a plausible claim for relief
that is plausible on its face, and did the District
Court violate Federal Rules and Supreme Court Precedent
in dismissing it?

2. Was the complaint in this case sufficient to meet the
threshold of Rule 8(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure ?

Whether the District Court violated Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Supreme Court precedent by dismissing a complaint that, accepting factual allegations as true, stated a plausible claim for relief under Rule 8(a)(2)