No. 25-7056
Dominic Miller v. United States
Response RequestedResponse WaivedIFP
Tags: allocution federal-rules-of-criminal-procedure plain-error revocation sentencing supervised-release
Latest Conference:
N/A
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1(b)(2)(E) requires a district court to personally invite a defendant to allocute before imposing a sentence following revocation of supervised release, such that complete denial of that opportunity constitutes plain error warranting resentencing.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1(b)(2)(E) requires a district court to personally invite a defendant to allocute before imposing a sentence following revocation of supervised release, such that complete denial of that opportunity constitutes plain error warranting resentencing
Docket Entries
2026-04-13
Response Requested. (Due May 13, 2026)
2026-04-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2026.
2026-03-27
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2026-03-27
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2026-03-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 17, 2026)
Attorneys
Dominic Miller
John Carlson — Ridley McGreevy & Winocur, Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent