Question Presented (from Petition)
Because the District Court and the County agreed on the facial attack procedure, should the Tenth Circuit on appeal have reversed the Order of the District Court which used in its Order allegations of fact from County's Motion to Dismiss under Rule 12(b)(1)?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Because the District Court and the County agreed on the facial attack procedure, should the Tenth Circuit on appeal have reversed the Order of the District Court which used in its Order allegations of fact from County's Motion to Dismiss under Rule 12(b)(1)?
Docket Entries
2026-02-23
Petition DENIED.
2026-01-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/20/2026.
2026-01-24
Reply of Co2 Committee, Inc., a Colorado Nonprofit Corporation submitted.
2026-01-24
Reply of Co2 Committee, Inc. submitted.
2026-01-23
Reply of petitioner Co2 Committee, Inc. filed. (Distributed)
2026-01-13
Brief of respondents Montezuma County, Colorado, et al. in opposition filed.
2025-12-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 16, 2026)
Attorneys
Co2 Committee, Inc.
John M. Cogswell — Cogswell Law Offices, Petitioner
Co2 Committee, Inc., a Colorado Nonprofit Corporation
John M Cogswell — Cogswell Law Offices, Petitioner
Montezuma County, et al.
Nathan Allen Keever — Dufford Waldeck Law, Respondent