Robinson Peralta v. City of New York, New York, et al.
Whether a federal district court may deny relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(d)(3) without adjudicating properly raised allegations of fraud on the court that were presented before and after final judgment.
Whether the mandate rule and claim preclusion bar consideration of Rule 60(d)(3) allegations where no court has issued findings resolving those allegations on their merits including after Appeal No. 24-1356.
Whether the Due Process Clause requires that properly raised allegations challenging the integrity of the judicial process receive adjudication on the merits rather than being declined through finality doctrines
Whether a federal district court may deny relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(d)(3) without adjudicating properly raised allegations of fraud on the court, and whether the mandate rule and claim preclusion bar consideration of such allegations where no court has issued findings resolving those allegations on their merits, and whether the Due Process Clause requires adjudication on the merits rather than dismissal through finality doctrines