1. Whether the Eleventh Circuit's opinion citing res judicata allows the government to overextend and leverage its permitting monopoly to take private property without just compensation violates the Takings Clause in light of Sheetz & Stop. Sheetz v. County of El Dorado, 144 S.Ct. 893 (2024); Stop the Beach Renourishment v. Florida Dept. of Environmental Protection, 560 U.S. 702 (2010).

2. Whether the Eleventh Circuit's opinion citing judicial immunity and res judicata constitutes a judicial taking proscribed by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution in light of Knick and Koontz. Knick v. Township of Scott, 139 S.Ct. 2162 (2019); Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Mgmt. Dist., 570 U.S. 595 (2018).

3. Whether the $100,000.00 fine imposed in the state court violated the 8th Amendment to the United States Constitution.

4. Whether the Due Process clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution were violated when trial by jury was demanded by the Plaintiff and denied in the District Court.

Whether the Eleventh Circuit's opinion citing res judicata allows the government to overextend and leverage its permitting monopoly to take private property without just compensation violates the Takings Clause