No. 25-6904
Dawn Marie Guevara v. United States
IFP
Tags: confrontation-clause criminal-procedure cross-examination harmless-error sixth-amendment witness-testimony
Latest Conference:
N/A
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether a reviewing court can properly conclude a confrontation clause violation is harmless when it fails to consider the impact of the erroneously admitted evidence on the jury's verdict?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a reviewing court can properly conclude a Confrontation Clause violation is harmless when it fails to consider the impact of the erroneously admitted evidence on the jury's verdict
Docket Entries
2026-01-30
Application (25A858) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until April 5, 2026.
2026-01-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 27, 2026)
2026-01-22
Application (25A858) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 4, 2026 to April 5, 2026, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
Dawn Guevara
Nancy G. Schwartz — N.G. Schwartz Law, PLLC, Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent