Dozens of federal offenses require, as a jurisdictional element, that the offense be committed "within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States." Is the status of a particular physical location under this language (i) a question of fact that must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt to the factfinder or (ii) a question of law that may be answered through judicial notice?

Whether the status of a particular physical location under the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States is a question of fact that must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt or a question of law that may be answered through judicial notice