Whether expiration of a short federal supervised-release revocation sentence during the pendency of a direct appeal categorically moots the appeal under Article III when no further supervision remains, even though such sentences routinely expire before appellate review can be completed.

Whether expiration of a short federal supervised-release revocation sentence during the pendency of a direct appeal categorically moots the appeal under Article III when no further supervision remains, even though such sentences routinely expire before appellate review can be completed