1. Is the 1871 municipal corporation (16 Stat. 419) a law made by Congress "respecting an establishment of religion ", and an unconstitutional violation of Article 1 in Amendment because it comes from what is now the Vatican and introduces the Pope 's Roman Canon Law into the United States of America?
2. Is the Minor Estate (31 CFR 363.6) a law made by Congress "respecting an establishment of religion ", and an unconstitutional violation of Article 1 in Amendment, because it was created by the Pope 's owned and operated Crown of England with the Cestui que vie Act of 1666, and brought into the United States with the Code of Law for the District of Columbia in 1901 at 31 Stat. 1432?
3. Is the National BAR Foundation (Title 35 USC 70501 through 70512) and all of its subsidiaries in the various States a law made by Congress "respecting an establishment of religion ", and an unconstitutional violation of Article 1 in Amendment because it is bringing the Pope 's private BAR Guild (British Accredited Regency) into the United States, which originated in the Pope 's owned and operated City of London, and they are claiming immunity under the International Organization Immunities Act of 1945 (59 Stat. 669)?
4. Is the National BAR Foundation {Title 35 USC 70501 through 70512) and all of its subsidiaries in the various states, a violation of Article I of the Definitive Treaty of Peace of 1783, which is the ONLY Article still in force under the Treaty Collection, which is the "supreme law of the Zand " under Article VI, Clause 2, because King George approved the Definitive Treaty of Peace of 1783 as "Arch Treasurer and Prince Elector of the Holy Roman Empire " evidencing he was approving it on behalf of the Pope, and because King George, and the Pope 's owned and operated Crown of England; "for himself his Heirs & Successors relinquishes all Claims to the Government Propriety " because "Propriety " is talking about private businesses, which includes the BAR.
5. Is the Minor Estate (31 CFR 363.6) a violation of the Organic Law of the Declaration of Independence (1776); "He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation: "For imposing taxes on us without our consent; " which is referencing the Pope and his Cestui que Vie Act of 1666, as the reason for the War of Independence.
6. Is it an unconstitutional violation of Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17, to use the Minor Estate (31 CFR 363.6) and the commerce clause (Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3) to convert the Petitioner 's land from the land of Texas into the foreign District of Columbia, when there is no evidence of Roman Canon Law commercial activity, and no contract, as evidenced by the fact that silver coin was converted to land and it was demanded to produce a "bona fide contract ", with no response of any kind?
7. Is a Judgment by the 97th District Court that makes the Petitioner a Minor Estate (31 CFR 363.6) a Bill of Pains and Penalties violation of the Bills of Attainder clauses Article 1, Section 9,
Question not identified.