1. When and where both hybrid crime and judicial crime exist in such extreme cases including this
case, how should the Constitution of the United States and/or the Supreme Court of the United
States protect the constitutional rights of such victims (including the petitioner)?

2. When and where such victims (including the petitioner) cannot perform their constitutional rights
because of the failure of the function of the rule of law, how should the Constitution of the United
States and/or the Supreme Court of the United States protect the constitutional rights of such
victims?

Whether the Constitution protects victims' constitutional rights when both hybrid crime and judicial crime exist and the rule of law has failed to function