No. 25-6856
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure fourth-amendment jury-instructions motion-to-suppress plain-error search-and-seizure
Latest Conference:
N/A
Question Presented (from Petition)
THE DISTRICT COURT COMMITTED PLAIN ERROR IN GIVING STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS THAT - WHEN READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH ONE ANOTHER:- PROVIDED INCORRECT OR CONFUSING STATEMENTS OF LAW.
THE DISTRICT COURT ERRED WHEN IT DENIED THE PETITIONER'S MOTION*TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE RELATED TO AN ILLEGAL SEARCH AND SEIZURE.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court committed plain error by giving standard jury instructions that provided incorrect or confusing statements of law when read in conjunction with one another, and whether the district court erred in denying petitioner's motion to suppress evidence related to an illegal search and seizure
Docket Entries
2026-02-25
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2026-02-25
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-05-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 23, 2026)
Attorneys
Jose O. Maes
Jose O. Maes — Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent